Swinburne
Browse

Annotations with a Tablet PC or typed feedback: does it make a difference?

Download (199.97 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-07-13, 02:49 authored by Lyn Brodie, Birgit Loch
The University of Southern Queensland (USQ) has adopted a flexibility agenda and thus, assignments in many disciplines are now submitted, marked and returned electronically. However, since some markers are more comfortable marking hardcopy assignments, electronically submitted assignments may still be printed, annotated, and the handwritten feedback scanned or typed to facilitate electronic return of assignments. The latter may limit the quantity, depth and placement of comments provided. This research focuses on a course where model answers or a standard set of comments cannot be generated and detailed individual marker feedback is required. Marking rubrics have been designed to standardize marking but in the implementation process, the level of individual feedback has deteriorated. This pilot study investigates how the feedback students have received previously when assignments were marked with typed comments, compares to this year's experience when the same marker was given a Tablet PC and was able to provide handwritten feedback.

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

Publisher website

ISBN

9781876346591

Journal title

Engineering the Curriculum, the 20th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2009), Adelaide, Australia, 06-09 December 2009 / Colin Kestell, Steven Grainger and John Cheung (eds.)

Conference name

Engineering the Curriculum, the 20th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education AAEE 2009, Adelaide, Australia, 06-09 December 2009 / Colin Kestell, Steven Grainger and John Cheung eds.

Pagination

5 pp

Publisher

University of Adelaide

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2009 Australasian Association for Engineering Education. The published version is reproduced with the permission of the publisher.

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC