Swinburne
Browse

Managing Consistency between Textual Requirements, Abstract Interactions and Essential Use Cases

Download (844.77 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-07-09, 14:20 authored by Massila Kamalrudin, John Grundy, John Hosking
Consistency checking needs to be done from the earliest phase of requirements capture as requirements captured by requirement engineers are often vague, error-prone and inconsistent with users’ needs. To improve such consistency checking we have applied a traceability approach with visualization capability. We have embedded this into a light-weight automated tracing tool in order to allow users to capture their requirements and generate Essential Use Case models of these requirements automatically. Our tool supports inconsistency checking between textual requirements, abstract interactions that derive from the text and Essential Use Case models. A preliminary evaluation has been conducted with target end users and the tool usefulness and ease of use are evaluated. We describe our motivation for this research, our prototype tool and results of our evaluation.

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISBN

9781424475124

ISSN

0730-3157

Conference name

2010 IEEE 34th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference

Volume

37

Issue

4

Pagination

9 pp

Publisher

IEEE

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2010 IEEE. The published version is reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE..

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC