Swinburne
Browse
- No file added yet -

Determining the contribution of retinotopic discrimination to localization performance with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis

Download (750.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-06, 10:55 authored by Matthew A. Petoe, Christopher McCarthyChristopher McCarthy, Mohit N. Shivdasani, Nicholas C. Sinclair, Adele F. Scott, Lauren N. Ayton, Nick M. Barnes, Robyn H. Guymer, Penelope J. Allen, Peter J. Blamey
Purpose: With a retinal prosthesis connected to a head-mounted camera, subjects can perform low vision tasks using a combination of electrode discrimination and head-directed localization. The objective of the present study was to investigate the contribution of retinotopic electrode discrimination (perception corresponding to the arrangement of the implanted electrodes with respect to their position beneath the retina) to visual performance for three recipients of a 24-channel suprachoroidal retinal implant. Proficiency in retinotopic discrimination may allow good performance with smaller head movements, and identification of this ability would be useful for targeted rehabilitation. Methods: Three participants with retinitis pigmentosa performed localization and grating acuity assessments using a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. We compared retinotopic and nonretinotopic electrode mapping and hypothesized that participants with measurable acuity in a normal retinotopic condition would be negatively impacted by the nonretinotopic condition. We also expected that participants without measurable acuity would preferentially use head movement over retinotopic information. Results: Only one participant was able to complete the grating acuity task. In the localization task, this participant exhibited significantly greater head movements and significantly lower localization scores when using the nonretinotopic electrode mapping. There was no significant difference in localization performance or head movement for the remaining two subjects when comparing retinotopic to nonretinotopic electrode mapping. Conclusions: Successful discrimination of retinotopic information is possible with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Head movement behavior during a localization task can be modified using a nonretinotopic mapping. Behavioral comparisons using retinotopic and nonretinotopic electrode mapping may be able to highlight deficiencies in retinotopic discrimination, with a view to address these deficiencies in a rehabilitation environment. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01603576).

Funding

Safety and Efficacy of a Surgically Implanted Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis ("Bionic Eye")

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

FOR A MATERIALIST ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Find out more...

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

1552-5783

Journal title

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Volume

58

Issue

7

Pagination

8 pp

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC