Swinburne
Browse

Differential lateralization for words and faces: Category or psychophysics?

Download (439.3 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-26, 14:12 authored by Evelyne Mercure, Frederic Dick, Hanife Halit, Jordy KaufmanJordy Kaufman, Mark H. Johnson
This set of three experiments assessed the influence of different psychophysical factors on the lateralization of the N170 event-related potential (ERP) component to words and faces. In all experiments, words elicited a left-lateralized N170, whereas faces elicited a right-lateralized or nonlateralized N170 depending on presentation conditions. Experiment 1 showed that lateralization for words (but not for faces) was influenced by spatial frequency. Experiment 2 showed that stimulus presentation time influenced N170 lateralization independently of spatial frequency composition. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that stimulus size and resolution did not influence N170 lateralization, but did influence N170 amplitude, albeit differentially for words and faces. These findings suggest that differential lateralization for words and faces, at least as measured by the N170, is influenced by spatial frequency (words), stimulus presentation time, and category.

Funding

Medical Research Council

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

1530-8898

Journal title

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volume

20

Issue

11

Pagination

17 pp

Publisher

MIT Press

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The published version is reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC