Swinburne
Browse

Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to reduce office workers’ sitting time: The"Stand up Victoria" trial

Download (550.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-06, 11:43 authored by Lan Gao, Anna Flego, David W. Dunstan, Elisabeth A.H. Winkler, Genevieve N. Healy, Elizabeth G. Eakin, Lisa Willenberg, Neville OwenNeville Owen, Anthony D. Lamontagne, Anita Lal, Glen H. Wiesner, Nyssa HadgraftNyssa Hadgraft, Marj L. Moodie
Objectives This study aimed to assess the economic credentials of a workplace-delivered intervention to reduce sitting time among desk-based workers. Methods We performed within-trial cost-efficacy analysis and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and recruited 231 desk-based workers, aged 24–65 years, across 14 worksites of one organization. Multicomponent workplace-delivered intervention was compared to usual practice. Main outcome measures including total device-measured workplace sitting time, body mass index (BMI), self-reported health-related quality of life (Assessment of Quality of Life-8D, AQoL-8D), and absenteeism measured at 12 months. Results Compared to usual practice, the intervention was associated with greater cost (AU$431/person), benefits in terms of reduced workplace sitting time [-46.8 minutes/8-hour workday, 95% confidence interval (CI):-69.9–-23.7] and increased workplace standing time (42.2 minutes/8-hour workday, 95% CI 23.8–60.6). However, there were no significant benefits for BMI [0.148 kg/m2 (95% CI-1.407–1.703)], QoL-8D [-0.006 (95% CI-0.074–0.063)] and absenteeism [2.12 days (95% CI-2.01–6.26)]. The incremental cost-efficacy ratios (ICER) ranged from AU$9.94 cost/minute reduction in workplace sitting time to AU$13.37/minute reduction in overall sitting time. CEA showed the intervention contributed to higher life year (LY) gains [0.01 (95% CI 0.009–0.011)], higher health-adjusted life year (HALY) gains [0.012 (95% CI 0.0105 – 0.0135)], and higher net costs [AU$344 (95% CI $331–358)], with corresponding ICER of AU$34 443/LY and AU$28 703/HALY if the intervention effects were to be sustained for five-years. CEA results were sensitive to assumptions surrounding intervention-effect decay rate and discount rate. Conclusions The intervention was cost-effective over the lifetime of the cohort when scaled up to the national workforce and provides important evidence for policy-makers and workplaces regarding allocation of resources to reduce workplace sitting.

Funding

Reducing prolonged workplace sitting time in office workers: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

Reducing prolonged sitting time in adults

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

Too Much Sitting â Developing New Approaches to Chronic Disease Prevention

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

Too Much Sitting and Too Little Exercise: Addressing Chronic Disease in Ageing Populations

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

University of Exeter and Finisterre UK Limited

Innovate UK

Find out more...

Unlocking the health effects of sitting to reduce chronic disease

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

Policy Research on Obesity and Food Systems

National Health and Medical Research Council

Find out more...

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

1795-990X

Journal title

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volume

44

Issue

5

Pagination

8 pp

Publisher

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2018 Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC