Swinburne
Browse

Performance appraisal of software testers

Download (3.24 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-09, 13:49 authored by Tanjila KanijTanjila Kanij, John Grundy, Robert Merkel
Context To determine the effectiveness of software testers a suitable performance appraisal approach is necessary, both for research and practice purposes. However, review of relevant literature reveals little information of how software testers are appraised in practice. Objective (i) To enhance our knowledge of industry practice of performance appraisal of software testers and (ii) to collect feedback from project managers on a proposed performance appraisal form for software testers. Method A web-based survey with questionnaire was used to collect responses. Participants were recruited using cluster and snowball sampling. 18 software development project managers participated. Results We found two broad trends in performance appraisal of software testers - same employee appraisal process for all employees and a specialized performance appraisal method for software testers. Detailed opinions were collected and analyzed on how performance of software testers should be appraised. Our proposed appraisal approach was generally well-received. Conclusion Factors such as number of bugs found after delivery and efficiency of executing test cases were considered important in appraising software testers' performance. Our proposed approach was refined based on the feedback received.

History

Available versions

PDF (Accepted manuscript)

ISSN

0950-5849

Journal title

Information and Software Technology

Volume

56

Issue

5

Pagination

495-505

Publisher

Elsevier

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. This is the accepted manuscript of a work that was accepted for publication in Information and Software Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Information and Software Technology, [VOL 56, ISSUE 5, (May 2014)] DOI http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.11.002

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC