Swinburne
Browse
- No file added yet -

Physical and mechanical properties of lightweight aerated geopolymer

Download (1.43 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-09, 13:57 authored by Jay SanjayanJay Sanjayan, Ali Nazari, Lei Chen, Giang Hoang Nguyen
In this study, it is going to investigate properties of lightweight geopolymer specimens aerated by aluminium powder. It has been established well that aluminium powder can be appropriately used for foaming of traditional concrete. Reaction between aluminium powder and alkali activator in geopolymers of this study caused high porous structures based on the weight ratios of constituent materials. Different specimens were made by changing sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, and alkali activator to fly ash weight ratios. Fly ash was substituted by aluminium powder with 1.5, 3.0 and 5.0 wt.% in different mixtures. Results indicated that substituting of 5.0 wt.% of fly ash by aluminium powder in the specimens with alkali activator to fly ash weight ratio of 0.35 and sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide weight ratio of 2.5 causes the best foamed specimen with the lowest density. Compressive strength of all aerated specimens were in the range of 0.9-4.35 MPa, which is suitable for using as bricks, fire-resistant panels, buried pipeline and so on. Finally, SEM analysis was conducted to evaluate the microstructure of successfully aerated geopolymer. It was seen that in highly aerated specimens, the foaming reaction is too fast that prevents complete alkali activation of geopolymers and many unreacted fly ash particles remains.

History

Available versions

PDF (Accepted manuscript)

ISSN

0950-0618

Journal title

Construction and Building Materials

Volume

79

Issue

MAR 2015

Pagination

236-244

Publisher

Elsevier

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Construction and Building Materials. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Construction and Building Materials, Vol 79, March 2015, DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.043. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC