Swinburne
Browse

Psychological distress and quality of life: Rationale and protocol of a prospective cohort study in a rural district in Bangaladesh

Download (1.84 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-11, 08:38 authored by Mohammed Nazim Uddin, Sunil BharSunil Bhar, Abdullah Al MahmudAbdullah Al Mahmud, Amirul IslamAmirul Islam
Introduction: A significant proportion of the global burden of disease has been attributed to mental and behavioural disorders. People with mental disorders (MDs) have lower levels of health-related quality of life than those without MDs. Several studies have shown that in low-resource countries, a range of social determinants including poor health literacy is critical in the epidemiological transition of disease outcome. There is a lack of evidence of MDs literacy, the prevalence and risk factors of common mental health conditions, or any validated instruments to measure psychological distress or evaluate the quality of life in rural areas of Bangladesh. Aims: The aims of this study are: (1) report the awareness, knowledge, attitudes and practice (KAP) of MDs; (2) estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for psychological distress; (3) measure association of psychological distress and other socio-demographic factors with quality of life and (4) test the feasibility to use Kessler 10-item (K10) and WHO Quality Of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires in rural Bangladesh for measuring psychological distress and quality of life. Methods and analysis: A sample of 1500 adults aged 18–59 years and 1200 older adults aged 60–90 years will be interviewed from a multistage cluster random sample. Each participant will go through a face-to-face interview to assess their awareness and KAP of MDs. Information about the participant’s sociodemographic and socioeconomicstatus will be collected along with the psychological distress (K10) and quality of life (WHOQOLBREF) questionnaires. Internal consistency, validity, reliability and item discrimination of K10 and WHOQOLBREF instruments will be determined by using Rasch analysis and regression techniques. Ethics and dissemination: Human Ethics Approval was received from the Swinburne University of Technology Human Ethics Committee. Results of this research will be disseminated via scientific forums including peerreviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

2044-6055

Journal title

BMJ Open

Volume

7

Issue

9

Article number

article no. e016745

Publisher

BMJ Group

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC