Swinburne
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

The SAMI Galaxy Survey: Comparing 3D spectroscopic observations with galaxies from cosmological hydrodynamical simulations

journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-06, 14:08 authored by Jesse Van De Sande, Claudia D.P. Lagos, Charlotte Welker, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Felix Schulze, Rhea Silvia Remus, Yannick Bahe, Sarah Brough, Julia J. Bryant, Luca Cortese, Scott M. Croom, Julien Devriendt, Yohan Dubois, Michael Goodwin, Iraklis S. Konstantopoulos, Jon S. Lawrence, Anne M. Medling, Christophe Pichon, Samuel N. Richards, Sebastian F. Sanchez, Nicholas Scott, Sarah Sweet
Cosmological hydrodynamical simulations are rich tools to understand the build-up of stellar mass and angular momentum in galaxies, but require some level of calibration to observations. We compare predictions at z similar to 0 from the EAGLE, HYDRANGEA, HORIZON-AGN, and MAGNETICUM simulations with integral field spectroscopic (IFS) data from the SAMI (Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field spectrograph) Galaxy Survey, ATLAS(3D), CALIFA (Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area), and MASSIVE surveys. The main goal of this work is to simultaneously compare structural, dynamical, and stellar population measurements in order to identify key areas of success and tension. We have taken great care to ensure that our simulated measurement methods match the observational methods as closely as possible, and we construct samples that match the observed stellar mass distribution for the combined IFS sample. We find that the EAGLE and HYDRANGEA simulations reproduce many galaxy relations but with some offsets at high stellar masses. There are moderate mismatches in R-e (+), epsilon (-), sigma(e) (-), and mean stellar age (+), where a plus sign indicates that quantities are too high on average, and minus sign too low. The HORIZON-AGN simulations qualitatively reproduce several galaxy relations, but there are a number of properties where we find a quantitative offset to observations. Massive galaxies are better matched to observations than galaxies at low and intermediate masses. Overall, we find mismatches in R-e (+), epsilon (-), sigma(e) (-), and (V/sigma)(e) (-). MAGNETICUM matches observations well: this is the only simulation where we find ellipticities typical for disc galaxies, but there are moderate differences in sigma(e) (-), (V/sigma)(e) (-), and mean stellar age (+). Our comparison between simulations and observational data has highlighted several areas for improvement, such as the need for improved modelling resulting in a better vertical disc structure, yet our results demonstrate the vast improvement of cosmological simulations in recent years.

Funding

ARC | FF0776384

ARC | LE130100198

ARC | FL140100278

ARC | DE150100618

ARC | CE170100013

ARC | FT140101166

ARC | FT180100231

ARC | FT180100066

ARC | CE110001020

The SAMI facility: a revolutionary multi-object hexabundle spectrograph : Australian Research Council (ARC) | LE130100198

ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions : Australian Research Council (ARC) | CE170100013

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

1365-2966

Journal title

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Volume

484

Issue

1

Pagination

869-891

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Copyright statement

This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC