Swinburne
Browse

The distribution of satellites around massive galaxies at 1 z 3 in zfourge/candels: Dependence on star formation activity

Download (1.6 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-06, 09:26 authored by Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij, Casey Papovich, Ryan F. Quadri, Kim-Vy H. Tran, Lee R. Spitler, Glenn KacprzakGlenn Kacprzak, Ivo LabbeIvo Labbe, Caroline M. S. Straatman, Karl GlazebrookKarl Glazebrook, Rebecca AllenRebecca Allen, Michael Cowley, Romeel Davé, Avishai Dekel, Henry C. Ferguson, W. G. Hartley, Anton M. Koekemoer, David C. Koo, Yu Lu, Nicola Mehrtens, Themiya NanayakkaraThemiya Nanayakkara, S. Eric Persson, Glen Rees, Brett Salmon, Vithal Tilvi, Adam R. Tomczak, Pieter van Dokkum
We study the statistical distribution of satellites around star-forming and quiescent central galaxies at 1 < z < 3 using imaging from the FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey and the Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey. The deep near-IR data select satellites down to log (M/M ☉) > 9 at z < 3. The radial satellite distribution around centrals is consistent with a projected Navarro-Frenk-White profile. Massive quiescent centrals, log (M/M ☉) > 10.78, have ~2 times the number of satellites compared to star-forming centrals with a significance of 2.7σ even after accounting for differences in the centrals' stellar-mass distributions. We find no statistical difference in the satellite distributions of intermediate-mass quiescent and star-forming centrals, 10.48 < log (M/M ☉) < 10.78. Compared to the Guo et al. semi-analytic model, the excess number of satellites indicates that quiescent centrals have halo masses 0.3 dex larger than star-forming centrals, even when the stellar-mass distributions are fixed. We use a simple toy model that relates halo mass and quenching, which roughly reproduces the observed quenched fractions and the differences in halo mass between star-forming and quenched galaxies only if galaxies have a quenching probability that increases with halo mass from ~0 for log (Mh /M ☉) ~ 11 to ~1 for log (Mh /M ☉) ~ 13.5. A single halo-mass quenching threshold is unable to reproduce the quiescent fraction and satellite distribution of centrals. Therefore, while halo quenching may be an important mechanism, it is unlikely to be the only factor driving quenching. It remains unclear why a high fraction of centrals remain star-forming even in relatively massive halos.

History

Available versions

PDF (Published version)

ISSN

1538-4357

Journal title

Astrophysical Journal

Volume

792

Issue

2

Article number

article no. 103

Pagination

18 pp

Publisher

Institute of Physics

Copyright statement

Copyright © 2014 The American Astronomical Society. The published version is reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher and can be also be located at http://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/103.

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    Publications

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC